The Department of Energy (“DOE”) has published its controversial “Still Interested” inquiry notice in the Federal Register. See 90 Fed. Reg. 39,187 (Aug. 14, 2025). According to the notice, the agency will be sending email correspondences to every requester with an open FOIA request filed before October 1, 2024, so long as that request is not in litigation. If the requester does not indicate his or her interest in the continued processing of the request by following the instructions contained in today’s notice, and responding within thirty days, the agency will administratively close the request. Part of the justification given for this step was the fact that DOE has been “inundated with requests from vexatious requesters and automated bots.” Requests pending at DOE field sites, the National Nuclear Security Administration, and the Federal Energy Regulation Commission are not subject to what some have termed this “en masse” still-interested inquiry.
FOIA News (2025)
FOIA News: "En Masse" Issuance of Still-Interested Letters at DOE Announced
FOIA News (2025)CommentTrump Administration Outlines Plan to Throw Out an Agency’s FOIA Requests En Masse
Jason Koebler, 404 Media, Aug. 13, 2025
The Department of Energy (DOE) said in a public notice scheduled to be published Thursday that it will throw out all Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests sent to the agency before October 1, 2024 unless the requester proactively emails the agency to tell it they are still interested in the documents they requested. This will result in the improper closure of likely thousands of FOIA requests if not more; government transparency experts told 404 Media that the move is “insane,” “ludicrous,” a “Pandora’s Box,” and “an underhanded attempt to close out as many FOIA requests as possible.”
The DOE notice says “requesters who submitted a FOIA request to DOE HQ at any time prior to October 1, 2024 (FY25), that is still open and is not under active litigation with DOE (or another Federal agency) shall email StillInterestedFOIA@hq.doe.gov to continue processing of the FOIA request […] If DOE HQ does not receive a response from requesters within the 30-day time-period with a DOE control number, no further action will be taken on the open FOIA request(s), and the file may be administratively closed.” A note at the top of the notice says it is scheduled to be formally published in the Federal Register on Thursday.
Read more here.
FOIA News: Webinar for immigration FOIAs
FOIA News (2025)CommentThe National Immigration Litigation Alliance will host a panel discussion on August 20, 2025, on how to file, appeal, and litigate immigration-related requests for records maintained by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. See details here.
FOIA News: How Private Detectives Use FOIA
FOIA News (2025)CommentFOIAengine Tracks Three Private Eyes on the Trail of Short-Seller Culper Research
By John Jenkins, Law St. Media, Aug. 6, 2025
Brian Willingham is a licensed private investigator in New York, ID# 1000149418. He runs an investigative agency called Diligentia Group. The company’s motto is “We Find Evidence That Normal People Can’t.”
* * *
Apart from sharing a furtive line of work, all three detectives have something else in common: They are using the federal Freedom of Information Act to conduct counter-surveillance on behalf of anonymous clients.
The use of FOIA proxy requesters is common and well known. We first bumped into the above three investigators a few weeks ago, while researching our story about the activist short-seller Christian Lamarco; his firm, Culper Research; and the mysterious “Jeff Bourland.” (See “Some Research Into Short-Seller Culper Research.”)
Read more here.
FOIA News: Tips for lowering FOIA fees
FOIA News (2025)Comment5 Tips for Slashing FOIA Costs (Including How One Reporter Lowered a Records Request Fee from $2,800 to Just $29)
By Rowan Philp, Global Investigative Journalism Network, Aug. 5, 2025
Reporters in many countries with freedom of information access (FOI) laws sometimes receive massive fee quotes from government agencies to retrieve, duplicate, redact, or export extensive public records they’ve requested.
“Emphasize that you don’t want to over-burden them… If something takes less time for them, it means less cost for you.” — Sharon Lurye, Associated Press data journalist
But it turns out that, with a little research and negotiation, reporters can sometimes slash the cost of obtaining records bundles and speed up the government’s response in the process.
Experts say that reporters should not automatically accept large fees quoted by FOI officers, and should remember that these officials are typically concerned with their estimated time burden, and not the cost figure. Also, keep in mind that reducing the cost of your request by reducing their time burden will likely shorten the time until you receive the files you want.
Read more here.
FOIA News: The Freedom of Information Act and Deteriorating Federal Transparency Infrastructure
FOIA News (2025)CommentThe Freedom of Information Act and Deteriorating Federal Transparency Infrastructure
By Amanda Teuscher, Just Security, Aug. 4, 2025
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) — the nation’s primary legal tool for accessing public records — is under increasing pressure. The longstanding need for meaningful FOIA reform, including increased resources and improved practices, has been overtaken by a wave of structural rollbacks that the United States has not seen before. As I show below, good government and pro-transparency organizations like American Oversight, the nonpartisan non-profit where I work, as well as investigators and political reporters, have been documenting a rise in denials, delays, and office closures, along with an uptick in other problematic practices. Combined with a pattern of disregard for disclosure and record-keeping requirements, these developments threaten to hollow out a core pillar of government accountability – and to weaken one of the public’s most effective checks on corruption. In this way, FOIA is not simply a tool for transparency. It is a mechanism for accountability, and one that has long helped expose corrupt actions, government misconduct and waste, and undue influence while providing crucial evidence for those seeking to hold power to account. Its weakening does not merely impair public knowledge; it also reduces the likelihood that abuses will be detected, investigated, or deterred.
Read more here.
FOIA News: Bernard Bell on FOIA and “First Party” Disclosure Requests
FOIA News (2025)CommentFOIA and “First Party” Disclosure Requests: Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs v. DOJ
By Bernard Bell, Yale J. on Reg., Notice & Comment, Aug. 4, 2025
In Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs v. DOJ, Dkt. No. 24-5127, ─ F.4th ─, 2025 WL 2088557 (D.C. Cir. July 27, 2025), the D.C. Circuit waded into the issues of records disclosure in response to first-party FOIA requests. Plaintiff Lawyers’ Committee represents various individual incarcerated in the federal prison system. According to the complaint filed in the case, the Lawyers’ Committee “routinely represents individuals incarcerated in the BOP [Bureau of Prisons] in cases to uphold their civil and constitutional rights.” ¶2. Timely access to “individual clients’ records” as well as “BOP-wide data related to compliance with the civil and constitutional rights” of the imprisoned is crucial to such an endeavor.
Read more here.
FOIA News: Recent report rehashes well-known FOIA stats
FOIA News (2025)CommentThe Freedom of Information Act Is Failing Due to Government Bloat
In FY 2024, over 200,000 Freedom of Information Act requests were backlogged, according to the Government Accountability Office.
By Sophia Mandt, Reason, July 29, 2025
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), a landmark law to increase government accountability, is falling short in its aim to improve transparency with American citizens, according to a recent report from Open the Books. FOIA gives the public the freedom to request government records from federal agencies, with the exception of certain information involving the White House, congressional records, confidential financial information, national security matters, and law enforcement records. In recent years, government-caused inefficiency has increased wait times for FOIA requests, which "have become so long they undercut the accountability FOIA is meant to provide," per Open the Books.
See more here.
N.B. The Department of Justice published government-wide FOIA metrics for FY 2024 in mid-March.
FOIA News: Yale journal discusses D.C. Circuit decision
FOIA News (2025)CommentFOIA and Classification Procedures: Project For Privacy And Surveillance Accountability v. DOJ
By Bernard Bell, Yale J. on Reg., Notice & Comment, July 24, 2025
On July 18, a D.C. Circuit panel decided that an agency could invoke Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) Exemption 1 (the national security exemption), even though it had not met some of the procedural requirements related to classification set forth in Executive Order 13,526. Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability v. Department of Justice, slip op. (D.C. Cir. July 18, 2025). Essentially, the panel distinguished some of the Executive Order’s procedural requirements from others ─ some must precede a proper classification, others governed agency obligations only after a document has been properly classified. The Court also made two other points of interest to those who follow FOIA.
Read more here.
FOIA News: Call for FOIA research proposals
FOIA News (2025)CommentCall for proposals: FOIA at 60 – Imagining the future of information access
Univ. of Florida, Joseph L. Brechner Freedom of Info. Proj., July 22, 2025
The Journal of Civic Information is launching a Research Competition and Special Issue to mark the upcoming 60th anniversary of FOIA. Scholars, journalists, practitioners, advocates, and students are invited to submit innovative proposals exploring the future of access to public information and what transparency, accountability, and civic information should look like 60 years from now.
Read more here.