FOIA Advisor

Q&A: members-only sorority retreat

Q&A (2015-2025)Kevin SchmidtComment

Q.  I belong to a sorority and we are having a members only retreat.  Do we need to be concerned with the FOIA?

A:  Unfortunately, your anonymous question did not identify the state in which your university is located or indicate whether your school is public or private.  Therefore, I cannot answer your question as fully as possible.  But you might take comfort in knowing that the federal Freedom of Information Act does not apply to the records of state, local, or private entities.  Further, unless your sorority or event is funded by a public university, state freedom of information laws should not provide public access to information about your sorority's retreat.  Nor do state freedom of information laws generally apply to the records of private entities.  I would note, however, that the Ohio Supreme Court recently decided that a private university's police records are subject to disclosure, a decision which the Student Press Law Center reported as follows: 

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in favor of a former student journalist Thursday, determining that police departments at private universities are public entities and must release records under the state’s open records law.

In a 4-3 decision, the Court ruled the Otterbein University Police Department can be compelled to produce public records because it employs sworn, state-certified police officers, who have the same arresting authority as municipal police or a county sheriff.

Read more here.  

FOIA News: Chaffetz blames White House memo for FOIA delays

FOIA News (2015-2025)Kevin SchmidtComment

Chaffetz blames White House memo for FOIA delays

By Josh Gerstein, Politico, June 2, 2015

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz charged Tuesday that President Barack Obama's White House is causing a a dramatic uptick in the backlog of Freedom of Information Act requests at government agencies.

At a hearing on FOIA, Chaffetz said the increasing delays in the disclosure process are traceable to an April 2009 memo issued by then-White House Counsel Greg Craig instructing agencies to consult with the White House before releasing any records involving "White House equities."

"If you’ve got the yahoos at the White House having to review each and every document that falls under FOIA, judicial subpoenas, Congressional committee requests, this is the heart of the backlog," Chaffetz shouted after hearing a panel of media witnesses describe problems with the law. "The heart of the backlog lies in this memo….'The White House equities.' You want to see the bottleneck? Look at the White House….This doesn’t say comply with the law. Does anywhere in the FOIA it say the White House general counsel’s office should review FOIA requests before it's given to the public or the media. No."

Read more here.

Oversight chief sees 'chilling effect' from White House memo on records

By Megan R. Wilson, The Hill, June 2, 2015

An Obama administration memo has had a “chilling effect” on the government’s compliance with open records laws, the Republican chairman of the House Oversight Committee argued Tuesday.

 Launching a two-day hearing on the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) blasted an email that directs federal agencies to consult with President Obama’s general counsel following any document request that could involve the White House.

“If you’ve got the yahoos at the White House having to review every document that falls under FOIA,” Chaffetz said. “This is the heart of the backlog.”

The memo, dated April 2009, applies to any documents that may have “White House equities.” Chaffetz suggested the memo is being used as an excuse to delay the release of documents. 

“No, no, no, don’t fulfill the FOIA request,” Chaffetz said of the memo. “Send it here to the White House. We have equities! The White House equities!”

Read more here.

FOIA News: White House and Department of Justice FOIA Memos Regarding White House Records

FOIA News (2015-2025)Kevin SchmidtComment

Below are the memoranda that have been issued to federal agencies concerning documents with White House equities (2009) and those originating with the White House (1993, 1992, 1988).   The 2009 and 1988 memoranda were mentioned by members of House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform during the FOIA hearing held on June 2, 2015. 

FOIA News: Preview of FOIA hearing's horror stories

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Government Secrecy Put On Trial

By Megan R. Wilson and Dustin Weaver, The Hill, June 2, 2015

Endless delays. Inflated costs. Stonewalling officials.

And in at least one case, redactions made in duct tape.

Welcome to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) — bureaucracy’s house of horrors and the subject of a two-day hearing in the House this week aimed at spotlighting what lawmakers say is a broken system.

While FOIA was passed to bring the government’s work into the light, it has resulted in the creation of a maddening system that thwarts reporters, advocacy groups and lawyers at every turn.

Members of both parties have expressed increasing frustration over the backlog in obtaining open records and the slow-walking of requests, with the scrutiny amplified by the battle over access to Hillary Clinton’s emails at the State Department.

Read more here

 

FOIA News: Congress subpoenas IRS to appear at FOIA hearing

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

IRS Official Subpoenaed After Agency Refused to Allow Voluntary Testimony

By Sharyl Attkinson, sharylattkinson.com, May 29, 2015  

The House Oversight Committee today issued a subpoena to compel the testimony of a public IRS official. That after the IRS failed to voluntarily allow the official, the Director of Privacy, Government Liaison and Disclosure, to confirm she would appear at a hearing next week examining federal agencies’ failure to follow Freedom of Information Act law.

Read more here

FOIA News: Fee category litigation heats up

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Obama Administration in FOIA Fees Fight

By Josh Gerstein, POLITICO, May 28, 2015

The Obama Administration is in a legal showdown over claims that officials are using the prospect of sky-high fees to try to block requests for government records under the Freedom of Information Act.

At a court hearing Wednesday, a non-profit research institute based at Syracuse University—the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse—complained to a federal judge that the government is arbitrarily denying the organization status as an educational organization and a member of the news media, designations that would allow the group to escape most of the fees that can be charged for FOIA requests.

During almost an hour of arguments on the issue, U.S. District Court Judge Christopher Cooper sounded sympathetic to TRAC's claims and, at times, incredulous of the government's position in the case.

"TRAC has been granted preferred status in the past. Why the change?" Cooper asked Assistant U.S. Attorney Marian Borum. "What information is missing? What didn’t they tell you?"

Read more here.