FOIA Advisor

FOIA News: Fed Reserve should be subject to FOIA, says Senator Toomey

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Top Republican Suggests Regional Fed Should Be Overhauled

  • Toomey says status quo of regional banks is ‘unacceptable’

  • He wants the Fed to be subject to public records request law

By Laura Davison, Bloomberg, Feb. 10, 2022

The top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee said Congress should weigh an overhaul of the U.S. Federal Reserve Regional Bank system and consider consolidating regional banks that are “wandering” into issues such as climate change.

Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania said Thursday that the 12 regional banks were formed to manage the economies in their districts, but that largely ended in the 1930s as oversight was taken over by the central bank. That’s left the regional banks without a clear mandate, he said.

* * *

Toomey said he is also concerned that the Fed is not being transparent with the public and has been “stonewalling” congressional inquiries into bank decisions. He said lawmakers should consider making the Fed subject to the records request law, the Freedom of Information Act, like other federal entities are.

Read more here.

Court opinion issued Feb. 8, 2022

Court Opinions (2015-2024)Allan BlutsteinComment

Junk v. Bd. of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys. (2nd Cir.) (summary order) -- affirming district court’s decision that agency performed adequate search for “‘records from Maiden Lane LLC and Maiden Lane II LLC and Maiden Lane III LLC containing’ a specific nine-digit alphanumeric Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures ("CUSIP") number.”

Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here.

FOIA News: Here come the FY 2021 annual reports

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Q&A: Identities of FOIA requesters

Q&A (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Q. What rule or regulation provides that the identity of the requester is not confidential? And does this apply to OSHA FOIA requests?

A. Federal courts have ruled that FOIA requesters do not ordinarily expect that their names will be kept private and, therefore, release of their names would not cause even the minimal invasion of privacy necessary to trigger the balancing test under Exemption 6. By contrast, courts have decided that the identities of first-party requesters under the Privacy Act of 1974 should be protected because, unlike under the FOIA, an expectation of privacy can fairly be inferred from the personal nature of the records involved in those requests. See, e.g., Hammond v. DOD (D.D.C.) (protecting names of requesters seeking their own medical records from Walter Reed hospital).

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration appears to follow the relevant case law, as illustrated by its processing of the following 2016-2017 FOIA log.

FOIA News: Activists want to revise Obama-era FOIA memo

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

FOIA Advocates Say Biden Administration Is Ignoring Transparency Issues

New administrations usually issue memos on transparency. The Biden administration has ignored calls to do so.

By C.J. Ciaramella, Reason, Feb. 4, 2022

It's been more than a year since President Joe Biden took office, but his administration has yet to publish guidance to agencies on federal public record laws, a break from tradition that has frustrated transparency advocates.

This week, a coalition of transparency groups sent a second letter calling on the Justice Department to issue a memo on its interpretation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the groundbreaking 1966 law that, in theory, ensures public access to government records.

Read more here.

Court opinions issued Feb. 2, 2022

Court Opinions (2015-2024)Allan BlutsteinComment

Am. Civil Liberties Union v. CIA (2nd Cir.) -- reversing district court’s decision requiring disclosure of certain information contained in a draft summary of CIA’s former detention and interrogation program and holding that such information was protected under Exemption 1.

Am. Civil Liberties Union v. CIA (D.D.C) -- concluding that agency properly relied on Exemptions 1, 3, 5, and 6 to withhold records concerning nomination of Gina Haspel to serve as CIA’s Director.

Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here.

Court opinion issued Feb. 1, 2022

Court Opinions (2015-2024)Allan BlutsteinComment

Woodard v. USMS (D.D.C.) -- following in camera review of records concerning agency’s use of cell phone technology in apprehending plaintiff for capital murder, finding that agency properly redacted names of law enforcement officers under Exemption 7(C) and that its use of Exemption 7(C), 7(E), 7(D), and 7(F) to redact or fully withhold other records was justified in some instances and not others.

Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here.

FOIA News: More from Yale's symposium on "Saving the Freedom of Information Act"

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment
  • No FOIA is an Island, by Heidi Kitrosser, Feb. 2, 2022

    Margaret Kwoka’s new book, Saving the Freedom of Information Act, is an impressive and important achievement. The book is grounded in the premise that the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was inspired by, and is best directed toward, the goal of facilitating public and journalistic oversight of American government.