FOIA Advisor

Court opinions issued June 1-2, 2023

Court Opinions (2015-2024)Allan BlutsteinComment

June 2, 2023

Smolen v. FAA (S.D.N.Y.) -- deciding that: (1) FAA properly relied on Exemption 4 to withhold draft agreement between the agency and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, and that it demonstrated reasonable foreseeable harm from disclosure; and (2) plaintiff failed to administratively appeal the adequacy of the agency’s search, but even if he had, agency’s search was adequate.

June 1, 2023

Sarama v. DEA (M.D. Fla.) -- concluding that: (1) plaintiff was eligible for attorney’s fees and costs because although DEA commenced search for certain records prior to lawsuit, it failed to process and disclose a mere 5 pages for a significant amount of time; (2) plaintiff was entitled to attorney’s fees and costs despite lack of public benefit on disclosure, because DEA’s response was unreasonable and plaintiff’s interest in disclosure was not commercial.

Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here.

FOIA News: Judge gives US government one week to handle request for Prince Harry’s visa records

FOIA News (2015-2025)Kevin SchmidtComment

Judge gives US government one week to handle request for Prince Harry’s visa records

By Holmes Lybrand, CNN, June 6. 2023

A federal judge has given the Department of Homeland Security until next Tuesday to decide how it will handle a conservative think tank’s request for Prince Harry’s US immigration records.

The Heritage Foundation has asked the US government via the Freedom of Information Act to see his visa application, citing his admission of past recreational drug use in his memoir. The group is questioning whether immigration officials properly granted Prince Harry’s application, since admission of past drug use can be grounds to reject a visa application.

Read more here.

FOIA News: Senators re-introduce FOIA legislation to restore "National Parks" test

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Grassley, Feinstein, Welch Reintroduce Bill To Restore FOIA Presumptions Of Openness, Transparency

Press Release, Office of Senator Charles Grassley, June 6, 2023

WASHINGTON – Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) today introduced legislation to improve the public’s access to information and ability to hold the federal bureaucracy accountable.  

The Open and Responsive Government Act aims to restore an appropriate legal interpretation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Exemption 4 on confidential commercial information. The bill also reinforces the law’s presumptions of openness and transparency by underscoring any information outside of the scope of FOIA’s nine exemptions should be publicly available.  

Read more here.

Text of bill here.

FOIA News: Draft FOIA tech standards to be issued "early this summer" for public comment

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

DOJ OIP leads effort to set FOIA tool tech standards across government

By Jory Heckman, Fed. News Network, June 2, 2023 

The Justice Department’s Office of Information Policy is leading a governmentwide effort to set technology standards for tools agencies use to manage a growing volume of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

DOJ OIP is leading an interagency working group setting standards for FOIA case management, along with National Archives and Records Administration’s Office of Government Information Service and the General Services Administration Office of Shared Services and Performance Improvement.

The working group expects to have a draft baseline version of the business standards available for public comment early this summer, and anticipates finalizing the business standards later this calendar year.

Read more here.

FOIA News: Frustrated requester sounds off in op-ed

FOIA News (2015-2025)Allan BlutsteinComment

Making a Federal FOIA Request? Good Luck!

By Pete McGinnis, Townhall,  May 28, 2023

FOIA is the acronym for the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), or it was when it became law in 1966. Since then, it’s come to stand for Feds Obfuscating, Impeding and Abusing. One of the first “open government” laws in the world often just highlights federal agencies shirking transparency and continuing dysfunction.

Read more here.

Court opinion issued May 24, 2023

Court Opinions (2015-2024)Allan BlutsteinComment

Cause of Action Inst. v. NOAA (D.D.C.) -- concluding that agency’s search was inadequate because agency too narrowly defined what constituted the “agency records” of one of its regional Fishery Management Councils by only including correspondence “submitted to the chair” or “specifically discussed or disseminated at a Council meeting”; ordering agency to conduct a supplemental search of non-federal employee council members’ personal accounts and devices.

Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here