Americans for Fair Treatment v. USPS (D.D.C.) -- on renewed summary judgment, deciding that: (1) USPS’s “speculative” explanations failed to establish foreseeable harm that would result from disclosure of records withheld under the deliberative process privilege; (2) USPS properly invoked the attorney-client privilege and its foreseeable harm explanation was “enough to pass” despite being “broad in a generic sense”; and (3) agency did not provide enough information to demonstrate that it properly segregated information with reasonable specificity.
Summaries of all published opinions issued in 2025 are available here. Earlier opinions are available for 2024 and from 2015 to 2023.