Transgender Law Ctr. v. Immigration & Customs Enf't (9th Cir.) -- reversing district court and finding that: (1) DHS agencies failed to show “beyond material doubt” that they conducted adequate search for records concerning asylum-seeker's death in federal custody; (2) government’s Vaughn Indices failed to provide sufficient detail to permit review of withholdings; (3) court erred in treating all drafts as necessarily covered by Exemption 5’s deliberative process privilege; (4) agencies improperly withheld email domain addresses of agency employees under Exemptions 6 and 7(C); (5) agencies failed to distinguish whether records withheld under Exemption 7(E) were law enforcement techniques and procedure or guidelines; and (6) agencies failed to provide sufficient detail concerning its segregability analysis.
Synopsys, Inc. v. DOL (9th Cir.) (unpublished) -- affirming district court’s decisions that: (1) company untimely moved to intervene after summary judgment was granted to FOIA requester seeking access to company’s employment data (EEO-1 reports); and (2) DOL was entitled to summary judgment in company’s reverse-FOIA action, finding that APA claim on Exemption 4 grounds was precluded by Supreme Court precedent.
Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here.